March 23, 2025
The role of scarcity promotion and cause-related events in impulse purchase in the agricultural product live stream
  • Xue, L. et al. China’s food loss and waste embodies increasing environmental impacts. Nat. Food 2(7), 519–528. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. et al. Optimal purchase and inventory retrieval policies for perishable seasonal agricultural products. Omega 79, 133–145. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J. et al. An empirical study on consumers’ willingness to buy agricultural products online and its influencing factors. J. Clean. Prod. (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei, X. & Deng, H. The process of value co-creation behavior about online live shopping in E-commerce platform based on the Taobao live shopping. Chin. J. Manag. 17(11), 11. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Q. The development motivation, current situation and trend of China’s live broadcast e – commerce. News Writ. 08, 84–91 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • iiMedia Research, 2020–2021 China online live broadcast industry annual research report. 2021, [EB/OL], https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/77452.html.

  • Peng, L. et al. Optimal farmer’s income from farm products sales on live streaming with random rewards: Case from China’s rural revitalisation strategy. Comput. Electron. Agric. 189, 106403 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M.-X. & Yang Morgan, X. Leveraging core capabilities and environmental dynamism for food traceability and firm performance in a food supply chain: A moderated mediation model. J. Integr. Agric. 18(8), 1820–1837. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, X., Zhu, C. & Zhu, H. The formation mechanism of consumer trust in E-commerce live streaming of agricultural products: The perspective of intermediary capabilities. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. Soc. Sci. Ed. 21(04), 142–154. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K. & Lee, Z. W. Y. The state of online impulse-buying research: A literature analysis. Inf. Manag. 54(2), 204–217. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K. et al. The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Cai, Q. & Chang, Q. Study on the identification and positioning of key control points of unsalable primary agricultural products – An empirical analysis based on 32 unsalable events of agricultural products. Rural Econ. 02, 51–55 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. et al. Cooedination of fresh agricultural supply chain with asymmetric freshness information. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 24(9), 9. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruit, D. & Almenar, E. First market study in e-commerce food packaging: Resources, performance, and trends. Food Packag. Shelf Life 29, 100698. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E. J. et al. Apparel product attributes, web browsing, and e-impulse buying on shopping websites. J. Bus. Res. 65(11), 1583–1589. (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, L.Y.-S., Lin, S.-W. & Hsu, L.-Y. Motivation for online impulse buying: A two-factor theory perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(5), 759–772. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerreiro, J., Rita, P. & Trigueiros, D. A text mining-based review of cause-related marketing literature. J. Bus. Ethics 139(1), 111–128. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. et al. How does scarcity promotion lead to impulse purchase in the online market? A field experiment. Inf. Manag. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan, B. & Ding, S. The second-replenishment policy for fresh agricultural product under customer classification. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 20(06), 87–93 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, M.-J. et al. Simulation research on online marketing strategies of branded agricultural products based on the difference in opinion leader attitudes. Inf. Process. Agric. 8(4), 528–536 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cang, Y. M. & Wang, D. C. A comparative study on the online shopping willingness of fresh agricultural products between experienced consumers and potential consumers. Sustain. Comput. Inf. Syst. 30(2), 100493. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodur, H. O., Tofighi, M. & Grohmann, B. When should private label brands endorse ethical attributes?. J. Retail. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Z. et al. Research on the expression of products ethical attributes based on consumer perception—In the case of online store’s agricultural products. Manag. Rev. 30(4), 11. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. et al. A study on the influence of the facial expressions of models on consumer purchase intention in advertisements for poverty alleviation products. Pers. Individ. Differ. 172(1), 110578. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. & Russell, J. A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology (MIT, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X. & Sun, J. Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users: An S-O-R perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 81, 10–18 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, L.-Y., Jaafar, N. I. & Ainin, S. The effects of Facebook browsing and usage intensity on impulse purchase in f-commerce. Comput. Hum. Behav. 78, 160–173. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopdar, P. K. & Balakrishnan, J. Consumers response towards mobile commerce applications: S–O–R approach. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, X.-J. et al. Are men from mars, women from venus? Examining gender differences towards continuous use intention of branded apps. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-J. & Yun, Z.-S. Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Qual. Prefer. 39, 259–267. (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. & Yao, J.-Y. What drives impulse buying behaviors in a mobile auction? The perspective of the stimulus-organism-response model. Telemat. Inf. 35(5), 1249–1262. (2018).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, R. & Wang, C. Study of the effects of online store specialization on consumer affect and behaviour—An empirical study based on college students’ sample. Manag. Rev. 26(01), 109–119 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X. et al. Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: An investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 48, 151–160. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Yao, Z. & Teo, T. S. H. Moral obligation in online social interaction: Clicking the “like” button. Inf. Manag. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M. A. et al. Consumer’s perceptions of website’s utilitarian and hedonic attributes and online purchase intentions: A cognitive–affective attitude approach. Span. J. Mark. ESIC 21(2), 73–88 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Hyun, H. & Park, J. The effect of interior color on customers’ aesthetic perception, emotion, and behavior in the luxury service. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, M. & Li, R. Understanding online user community user contribution behavior formation through online social support and self-determination theory. Manag. Rev. 32(09), 168–181 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Djafarova, E. & Bowes, T. ‘Instagram made Me buy it’: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, L. B. L. et al. Store atmosphere and impulse: A cross-cultural study. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 47(8), 817–835. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L.-T. Flow and social capital theory in online impulse buying. J. Bus. Res. 69(6), 2277–2283. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. et al. Consumers’ intention to participate in social commerce from a consumer experience perspective. J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. 31(02), 40–46. (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 58(9), 697–720. (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bago, B. & De Neys, W. Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition 158, 90–109. (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R. & Gorlin, M. A dual-system framework to understand preference construction processes in choice. J. Consum. Psychol. 23(4), 528–542. (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. & Wang, W. Does mobile shopping make fast decisions? The role of contextual factors and thinking style. Acta Psychol. Sin. 51(5), 13. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-C. & Lin, Y.-C. What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telemat. Inform. 35(1), 293–303. (2018).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Li, X. & Cai, J. How attachment affects user stickiness on live streaming platforms: A socio-technical approach perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. To shop or not: Understanding Chinese consumers’ live-stream shopping intentions from the perspectives of uses and gratifications, perceived network size, perceptions of digital celebrities, and shopping orientations. Telemat. Inf. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, F., Chen, L. & Su, Q. Understanding the impact of social distance on users’ broadcasting intention on live streaming platforms: A lens of the challenge-hindrance stress perspective. Telemat. Inform. 41, 46–54. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. et al. Assessing determinants influencing continued use of live streaming services: An extended perceived value theory of streaming addiction. Expert Syst. Appl. (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J. S. et al. The role of wishful identification, emotional engagement, and para social relationships in repeated viewing of live-streaming games: A social cognitive theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M., Zhang, M. & Wang, Y. Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 594–606. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, E. et al. Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming. Telemat. Inf. 35(5), 1450–1460. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wongkitrungrueng, A. & Assarut, N. The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. J. Bus. Res. 117, 543–556. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. et al. Examining gifting behavior on live streaming platforms: An identity-based motivation model. Inf. Manag. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, H. The significance of impulse buying today. J. Mark. (1962).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, C., Holmes, G. R. & Keneson, W. C. A meta-analysis of consumer impulse buying. J. Retail. Con-sumer Serv. 21(2), 86–97. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. et al. How do product recommendations affect impulse buying? An empirical study on WeChat social commerce. Inf. Manag. 56(2), 236–248. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, I.-L., Chiu, M.-L. & Chen, K.-W. Defining the determinants of online impulse buying through a shopping process of integrating perceived risk, expectation-confirmation model, and flow theory issues. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C.-L. How vloggers embrace their viewers: Focusing on the roles of para-social interactions and flow experience. Telemat. Inf. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez, D. et al. Investigating narrative involvement, parasocial interactions, and impulse buying behaviours within a second screen social commerce context. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, L. et al. Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(3), 333–347. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, T. & van Dolen, W. The influence of online store beliefs on consumer online impulse buying: A model and empirical application. Inf. Manag. 48(8), 320–327. (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, X. et al. Research on the influencing mechanism of atmosphere clue on impulse purchase intention in live streaming context. Chin. J. Manag. 16(06), 875–882 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M. & Nyer, P. U. The role of emotions in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 27(2), 184–206 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, D. & John, R. Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. J. Retail. 58(1), 34–57 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, N. Just moseying around and happening upon it versus a master plan: Minimizing regret in impulse versus planned sales promotion purchases. Psychol. Mark. 23(1), 57–73. (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P., Jun, S. Y. & Huh, J. H. Scarcity messages. J. Advert. 40(3), 19–30 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, S., S. Dutta, and A. Koksal, Effectiveness of monetary discounts: Comparing quantity scarcity and time restriction. J. Consum. Mark. (2019).

  • Song, M., Choi, S. & Moon, J. Limited time or limited quantity? The impact of other consumer existence and perceived competition on the scarcity messaging-Purchase intention relation. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 47, 167–175 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, G., Malhotra, D. & Murnighan, J. K. Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 96(2), 89–103. (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn, S. & Mano, H. Multi-attribute choice and affect: The influence of naturally occurring and manipulated moods on choice processes. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 6(1), 33–51. (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nan, X. & Heo, K. Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. J. Advert. 36(2), 63–74. (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. et al. Cause marketing effectiveness and the moderating role of price discounts. J. Mark. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. The moral emotions. In Handbook of Affective Sciences 852–870 (Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Algoe, S. B. & Haidt, J. Witnessing excellence in action: the ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. J. Posit. Psychol. 4(2), 105–127. (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grappi, S. & Romani, S. How companies’ good deeds encourage consumers to adopt pro-social behavior. Eur. J. Mark. 48(5/6), 943–963. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. The positive emotion of elevation. Prev. Treat. (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R. & Zheng, L. Donation amount and consumer attitudes in cause-related marketing: Test of a mediated-moderation model. Acta Psychol. Sin. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Zhu, Y. & Jiang, R. The mediating role of moral elevation in cause-related marketing: A moral psychological perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 156(2), 439–454. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, T. & Li, K. K. crowding out in the labor market: A prosocial setting is necessary. Manag. Sci. 60(5), 1148–1160. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Zhao, Y. et al. Research on the influences of donation appeal references on donation behavior. Nankai Bus. Rev. 1–15 [2022–03–22]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20210804.1334.002.html.

  • Berkowitz, E. N. & Walton, J. R. Contextual influences on consumer price responses: an experimental analysis. J. Marketing Res.
    17(3), 349–358 (1980).

  • Beatty, S. E. Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. J. Retail. (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. & Mehrabian, A. Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. J. Res. Pers. 11(3), 273–294. (1977).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D. R. et al. Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. J. Mark. Res. (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. & Gardner, W. Who is this”We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C. Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Adm. Sci. Q. 34(4), 565. (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. K. & Totten, J. W. Self-construal’s role in mobile TV acceptance: Extension of TAM across cultures. J. Bus. Res. 65(11), 1525–1533. (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. & Huang, Y. Cause-related marketing is not always less favorable than corporate philanthropy: The moderating role of self-construal. Int. J. Res. Mark. 33(4), 868–880. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes A F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (2013).

  • Podsakoff, P. M. et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903. (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, D. & Bognanno, M. High-powered performance pay and crowding out of nonmonetary motives. Manag. Sci. 64(10), 4669–4680. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. et al. The magic of danmaku: A social interaction perspective of gift sending on live streaming platforms. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R. & Menon, A. Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. J. Mark. (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W. et al. The structure and measurement of the moral elevation. Adv. Psychol. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerreiro, J., Rita, P. & Trigueiros, D. Attention, emotions and cause-related marketing effectiveness. Eur. J. Mark. 49(11/12), 1728–1750. (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., Du, L. & Li, J. Cause’s attributes influencing consumer’s purchasing intention: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *