October 26, 2025
The impact of smart wearable product influence elements on health promotion behaviors
  • Abernethy A, Adams L, Barrett M et al. (2022) The promise of digital health: then, now, and the future. NAM Perspect 6:108–116. https://doi.org/10.31478/202206e

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • AI-Emran M, Al-Maroof R, Al-Sharafi MA et al. (2022) What impacts learning with wearables? An integrated theoretical model. Interact Learn Environ 30(10):1897–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1753216

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaya Rivas A, Liao YK, Vu MQ et al. (2022) Toward a comprehensive model of green marketing and innovative green adoption: application of a stimulus-organism-response model. Sustainability 14(6):3288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063288

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen TO, Langstrup H, Lomborg S (2020) Experiences with wearable activity data during self-care by chronic heart patients: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 22(7):e15873. https://doi.org/10.2196/15873

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo T (2018) Living up to the chatbot hype: the influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput Hum Behav 85(85):183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimakopoulos S, Asimakopoulos G, Spillers F (2017) Motivation and user engagement in fitness tracking: heuristics for mobile healthcare wearables. Informatics 4(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4010005

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Azizan A, Justine M, Kuan CS (2013) Effects of a behavioral program on exercise adherence and exercise self-efficacy in community-dwelling older persons. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2013(1):282315. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/282315

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin Sci Quart 36(3):421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1826

  • Bandura A (2014) Self-efficacy mechanism in psychobiologic functioning. In: Schwarzer R (ed) Self-efficacy: thought control of action, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 355–394

  • Becker H, Stuifbergen A, Oh HS et al. (1993) Self-rated abilities for health practices: a health self-efficacy measure. Health Val J Health Behav Educ Promot 17(5):42–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Beg S, Handa M, Shukla R et al. (2022) Wearable smart devices in cancer diagnosis and remote clinical trial monitoring: transforming the healthcare applications. Drug Discov Today 27(10):103314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2022.06.014

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berriche M, Altay S (2020) Internet users engage more with phatic posts than with health misinformation on Facebook. Palgrave Commun 6(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0452-1

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blijlevens J, Thurgood C, Hekkert P et al. (2017) The aesthetic pleasure in design scale: the development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts. Psychol Aesthet Creat 11(1):86–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000098

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldi A, Silacci A, Boldi MO et al. (2024) Exploring the impact of commercial wearable activity trackers on body awareness and body representations: a mixed-methods study on self-tracking. Comput Hum Behav 151:108036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108036

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölen MC (2020) Exploring the determinants of users’ continuance intention in smartwatches. Technol Soc 60(1):101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101209

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr C, Cristianini N, Ladyman J (2018) An analysis of the interaction between intelligent software agents and human users. Mind Mach 28(4):735–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9479-0

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne BM, Baron P, Balev J (1998) The beck depression inventory: a cross-validated test of second-order factorial structure for Bulgarian adolescents. Educ Psychol Meas 58(2):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058002007

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Canhoto AI, Arp S (2017) Exploring the factors that support the adoption and sustained use of health and fitness wearables. J Market Manag 33(1–2):32–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2016.1234505

  • Castiello U, Becchio C, Zoia S et al. (2010) Wired to be social: the ontogeny of human interaction. PLoS ONE 5(10):e13199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013199

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran R, Katthula V, Moustakas E (2020) Patterns of use and key predictors for the use of wearable health care devices by US adults: insights from a national survey. J Med Internet Res 22(10):e22443. https://doi.org/10.2196/22443

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng JW, Mitomo H (2017) The underlying factors of the perceived usefulness of using smart wearable devices for disaster applications. Telemat Inf 34(2):528–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.010

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang JH, Yang PC, Tu H (2014) Pattern analysis in daily physical activity data for personal health management. Pervasive Mob Comput 13:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.12.003

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib A, Lin SH (2018) Theoretical advancements in mHealth: a systematic review of mobile apps. J Health Commun 23(10–11):909–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1544676

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou WB, Wan CS (2007) The dynamic change of self-efficacy in information searching on the internet: influence of valence of experience and prior self-efficacy. J Psychol 141(6):589–603. https://doi.org/10.3200/jrlp.141.6.589-604

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitturi R, Raghunathan R, Mahajan V (2008) Delight by design: the role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. J Mark 72(3):48–63. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.72.3.048

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho WC, Lee KY, Yang SB (2019) What makes you feel attached to smartwatches? The stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) perspectives. Inf Technol People 32(2):319–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-05-2017-0152

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe EK, Lee B, Munson S et al. (2013) Persuasive performance feedback: the effect of framing on self-efficacy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2013:825–833

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Pressman SD (2006) Positive affect and health. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(3):122–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00420.x

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti G (2003) Complexity as a new framework for emotion theories. Log Philos Sci 1(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehghani M, Kim KJ, Dangelico RM (2018) Will smartwatches last? Factors contributing to intention to keep using smart wearable technology. Telemat Inf 35(2):480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.007

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Chan MY (2011) Happy people live longer: subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Appl Psychol Health WellBeing 3(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimou E, Manavis A, Papachristou E et al. (2017) A conceptual design of intelligent shoes for pregnant women. In: Rinaldi R, Bandinelli R (eds) Business models and ICT technologies for the fashion supply chain. IT4Fashion 2016. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 413. Springer, Cham, pp 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48511-9_6

  • Dunn J, Runge R, Snyder M (2018) Wearables and the medical revolution. Pers Med 15(5):429–448. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2018-0044

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebstrup JF, Eplov LF, Pisinger C (2011) Association between the five factor personality traits and perceived stress: is the effect mediated by general self-efficacy? Anxiety Stress Copin 24(4):407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.540012

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon M, Spohrer K, Heinzl A (2019) Wearable devices: a physiological and self-regulatory intervention for increasing attention in the workplace. In: Davis F, Riedl R, Vom Brocke J, Léger PM, Randolph A (eds) Information systems and neuroscience. Lecture notes in information systems and organisation, vol 29. Springer, Cham, pp 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_28

  • Fan C, Forlizzi J, Dey A (2012) Considerations for technology that support physical activity by older adults. Paper presented at the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 22–24 Oct 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384923

  • Fogg BJ (2003) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam

  • Fang Y, Gao X, Sun C et al. (2024) The mediating role of health consciousness in the relation between time-related personality and health-promoting behavior. Curr Psychol 43(4):3649–3656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04617-x

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons FX, Buunk BP (1999) Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(1):129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowin M, Wilkerson A, Maness S et al. (2019) Wearable activity tracker use in young adults through the lens of social cognitive theory. Am J Health Educ 50(1):40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2018.1548314

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grembowski D, Patrick D, Diehr P et al. (1993) Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults. J Health Soc Behav 34(2):89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137237

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualtieri L, Rosenbluth S, Phillips J (2016) Can a free wearable activity tracker change behavior? The impact of trackers on adults in a physician-led wellness group. JMIR Res Protoc 5(4):e237. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6534

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntzviller LM, King AJ, Jensen JD et al. (2017) Self-efficacy, health literacy, and nutrition and exercise behaviors in a low-income, Hispanic population. J Immigr Minor Health 19(2):489–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0384-4

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gür F, Gür GC, Ayan V (2020) The effect of the ERVE smartphone app on physical activity, quality of life, self-efficacy, and exercise motivation for inactive people: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Integr Med 39:101198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2020.101198

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM et al. (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci 40(3):414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Wiklund-Engblom A, Bengs A et al. (2015) Experience-oriented and product-oriented evaluation: psychological need fulfillment, positive affect, and product perception. Int J Hum Comput Int 31(8):530–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064664

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert P (2006) Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychol Sci 48(2):157

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43:115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinpour M, Terlutter R (2019) Your personal motivator is with you: a systematic review of mobile phone applications aiming at increasing physical activity. Sports Med 49(9):1425–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01128-3

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao KL, Chen CC (2018) What drives smartwatch purchase intention? Perspectives from hardware, software, design, and value. Telemat Inf 35(1):103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.002

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Huang Q, Zhong X et al. (2016) The influence of peer characteristics and technical features of a social shopping website on a consumer’s purchase intention. Int J Inf Manag 36(6):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.005

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Chen Q, Huang S et al. (2024) Consumer intention to use service robots: a cognitive-affective-conative framework. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 36(6):1893–1913. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2022-1528

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilioudi S, Lazakidou A, Tsironi M (2010) Information and communication technologies for better patient self-management and self-efficacy. Int J Electron Health 5(4):327. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeh.2010.036205

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Intille SS (2004) A new research challenge: persuasive technology to motivate healthy aging. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 8(3):235–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/titb.2004.835531

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyawa GE, Herselman M, Botha A (2016) Digital health innovation ecosystems: from systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Procedia Comput Sci 100:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.149

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ES, Tucker CM, Herman KC (2007) Health value, perceived social support, and health self-efficacy as factors in a health-promoting lifestyle. J Am Coll Health 56(1):69–74. https://doi.org/10.3200/jach.56.1.69-74

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafarlou S, Lai J, Azimi I et al. (2023) Objective prediction of next-day’s affect using multimodal physiological and behavioral data: algorithm development and validation study. JMIR Form Res 7(1):e39425. https://doi.org/10.2196/39425

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • James TL, Wallace L, Deane JK (2019) Using organismic integration theory to explore the associations between users’ exercise motivations and fitness technology feature set use. MIS Q 43(1):287–312. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2019/14128

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia G, Fan DX, Xu J et al. (2024) Tourist prosocial behavior: scale development and its role between tourist destination social exclusion and wellbeing. J Sustain Tour 32(12):2518–2539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2289357

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia M, Cheng J (2024) Effect of teacher social support on students’ emotions and learning engagement: a U.S.-Chinese classroom investigation. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02634-0

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocevski M, Arvidsson N, Ghezzi A (2020) Interconnected business models: present debates and future agenda. J Bus Ind Mark 35(6):1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-06-2019-0292

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Choi B, Cho W (2021) Group satisfaction with group work under surveillance: the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) perspective. Telemat Inf 58(3):101530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101530

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Kim S, Choi B (2016) Consumer valuation of the wearables: the case of smartwatches. Comput Hum Behav 63:899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Karahanoğlu A, Erbuğ Ç (2011) Perceived qualities of smart wearables: determinants of user acceptance. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Middle East Technical University, Ankara/Turkey, 22–25 June. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347504.2347533

  • Kashian N, Liu Y (2020) Posting exercise activity on social media for self-efficacy and well-being. South Commun J 85(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2019.1658801

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner C, Goodyear VA (2017) The motivational impact of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: a self-determination perspective on fitbits with adolescents. Am J Health Educ 48(5):287–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2017.1343161

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen E, Kari T, Makkonen M et al. (2020) Young elderly and digital coaching: a quantitative intervention study on exercise self-efficacy. Paper presented at the 33rd Bled eConference: enabling technology for a sustainable society, University of Maribor, Slovenia, 28–29 June 2020. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-362-3.32

  • Kim EA, Chung YK, Kim KS (2000) A study on the relations of health promoting daily life style and self-efficiency in boys’ high. J Korean Soc Sch Health 13(2):241–259

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim HI (2024) Exploring the interplay of language mindsets, self-efficacy, engagement, and perceived proficiency in L2 learning. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03783-y

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim M (2021) Conceptualization of e-servicescapes in the fitness applications and wearable devices context: multi-dimensions, consumer satisfaction, and behavioral intention. J Retail Consum Serv 61(4):102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102562

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh A, Swanepoel DW, Ling A et al. (2021) Digital health promotion: promise and peril. Health Promot Int 36(Suppl 1):i70–i80. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab134

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranz M, Möller A, Hammerla N et al. (2013) The mobile fitness coach: towards individualized skill assessment using personalized mobile devices. Pervasive Mob Comput 9(2):203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.06.002

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Noble CH (2016) Beyond form and function: why do consumers value product design? J Bus Res 69(2):613–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.017

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuonanoja L, Langrial S, Lappalainen R et al. (2015) Treating depression with a behavior change support system without face-to-face therapy. AIS Trans Hum Comput Interact 7(3):192–210. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00072

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak DH, Ramamurthy KR, Nazareth DL (2019) Beautiful is good and good is reputable: multiple-attribute charity website evaluation and initial perceptions of reputation under the halo effect. J Assoc Inf Syst 20(11):3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00580

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Langrial SU, Lappalainen P (2016) Information systems for improving mental health: six emerging themes of research. Paper presented at the 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, 27 June 2016. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/16

  • Lee B, Kim J (2019) The effect of health promotion behavior on emotional happiness. Int J Adv Cult Technol 7(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.17703/ijact.2019.7.1.20

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee EJ (2022) Do tech products have a beauty premium? The effect of visual aesthetics of wearables on willingness-to-pay premium and the role of product category involvement. J Retail Consum Serv 65(2):102872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102872

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Chung N, Koo C (2015) Moderating effects of distrust and social influence on aesthetic experience of augmented reality: motivation-opportunity-ability model perspective. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2015, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 3–5 August 2015. https://doi.org/10.1145/2781562.2781588

  • Lemola S, Gkiouleka A, Read B et al. (2021) Can a “rewards-for-exercise app” increase physical activity, subjective well-being and sleep quality? An open-label single-arm trial among university staff with low to moderate physical activity levels. BMC Public Health 21(1):782. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10794-w

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Lin SH, Chib A (2021) The state of wearable health technologies: a transdisciplinary literature review. Mob Media Commun 9(2):353–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920966023

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Wu C, Spence C (2023) Comparing the influence of visual information and the perceived intelligence of voice assistants when shopping for sustainable clothing online. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02244-2

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim JS, Noh GY (2017) Effects of gain-versus loss-framed performance feedback on the use of fitness apps: mediating role of exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations of exercise. Comput Hum Behav 77(12):249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.006

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard G, Dudek C, Sen D et al. (2011) An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Trans Comput Hum Int 18(1):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1959022.1959023

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JYW, Kor PPK, Chan CPY et al. (2020) The effectiveness of a wearable activity tracker (WAT)-based intervention to improve physical activity levels in sedentary older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 91(6):104211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104211

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes PN, Nezlek JB, Extremera N et al. (2011) Emotion regulation and the quality of social interaction: does the ability to evaluate emotional situations and identify effective responses matter? J Pers 79(2):429–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00689.x

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo H, Gao B (2021) Development of smart wearable sensors for life healthcare. Eng Regen 2(1):163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2021.10.001

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantello P, Ho MT, Nguyen MH et al. (2023) Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01837-1

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maragiannis A, Ashford R (2019) Diversity and inclusivity in the age of wearables: a buzzword, a myth, an uncertain reality. Body Space Technol 18(1):198–214. https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.320

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattila E, Orsama AL, Ahtinen A et al. (2013) Personal health technologies in employee health promotion: usage activity, usefulness, and health-related outcomes in a 1-year randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 1(2):e2557. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.2557

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack GR, Petersen JA, Ghoneim D et al. (2022) Effectiveness of an 8-week physical activity intervention involving wearable activity trackers and an ehealth app: Mixed methods study. JMIR Form Res 6(5):e37348. https://doi.org/10.2196/37348

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A et al. (1988) An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 15(4):351–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Russell JA (1974) An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C (2011) Aesthetics and e-assessment: the interplay of emotional design and learner performance. Distance Educ 32(3):307–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610291

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirdehghani M, Monadjemi SA (2009) Web pages aesthetic evaluation using low-level visual features. Proc World Acad Sci Eng Technol 49:811–814. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082371

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morowatisharifabad MA, Ghofranipour F, Heidarnia A et al. (2006) Self-efficacy and health promotion behaviors of older adults in Iran. Soc Behav Personal Int J 34(7):759–768. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.7.759

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntaner-Mas A, Martinez-Nicolas A, Lavie CJ et al. (2019) A systematic review of fitness apps and their potential clinical and sports utility for objective and remote assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness. Sports Med 49(4):587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01084-y

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Musavian AS, Pasha A, Rahebi SM et al. (2014) Health promoting behaviors among adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Nurs Midwifery Stud 3(1):e14560. https://doi.org/10.17795/nmsjournal14560

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Myneni S, Cobb N, Cohen T (2016) In pursuit of theoretical ground in behavior change support systems: analysis of peer-to-peer communication in a health-related online community. J Med Internet Res 18(2):e28. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4671

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson EC, Verhagen T, Noordzij ML (2016) Health empowerment through activity trackers: an empirical smart wristband study. Comput Hum Behav 62:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.065

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Neupert SD, Lachman ME, Whitbourne SB (2009) Exercise self-efficacy and control beliefs: effects on exercise behavior after an exercise intervention for older adults. J Aging Phys Act 17(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.17.1.1

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Niknejad N, Ismail WB, Mardani A et al. (2020) A comprehensive overview of smart wearables: the state of the art literature, recent advances, and future challenges. Eng Appl Artif Intel 90(4):103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103529

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor MHM, Salcic Z, Wang K (2016) Enhancing ontological reasoning with uncertainty handling for activity recognition. Knowl Based Syst 114(24):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.09.028

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally J, Bernstein I (2010) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylocks KM, Rafaeli E, Bar-Kalifa E et al. (2019) Testing the influence of negative and positive emotion on future health-promoting behaviors in a community sample. Motiv Emot 43(2):285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9729-8

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Olander EK, Fletcher H, Williams S et al. (2013) What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals’ physical activity self-efficacy and behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys 10(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-29

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong AD (2010) Pathways linking positive emotion and health in later life. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 19(6):358–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388805

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir D, Sharma M, Dhir A et al. (2022) Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technol Soc 68:101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101847

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Parboteeah DV, Valacich JS, Wells JD (2009) The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Inf Syst Res 20(1):60–78. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0157

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park E (2020) User acceptance of smart wearable devices: an expectation-confirmation model approach. Telemat Inf 47(2):101318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101318

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Kim J, Kim SY et al. (2018) Soft, smart contact lenses with integrations of wireless circuits, glucose sensors, and displays. Sci Adv 4(1):eaap9841. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9841

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascucci MA, Chu N, Leasure AR (2012) Health promotion for the oldest of old people. Nurs Older People 24(3):22–28. https://doi.org/10.7748/nop2012.04.24.3.22.c9017

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman M, Harrison D, Marshall P, Cecchinato ME (2018) The role of aesthetics and design: wearables in situ. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, University College London, London, 21–26 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188556

  • Peng W, Li L, Kononova A et al. (2021) Habit formation in wearable activity tracker use among older adults: qualitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 9(1):e22488. https://doi.org/10.2196/22488

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) Methodological factors in the ELM. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_2

  • Phillips DM, Baumgartner H (2002) The role of consumption emotions in the satisfaction response. J Consum Psychol 12(3):243–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/153276602760335086

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyportis A, Pahos N (2025) Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: the role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy. Behav Inf Technol 44(2):315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2317364

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkova EG, De Bernardi P, Tyurina YG et al. (2022) A theory of digital technology advancement to address the grand challenges of sustainable development. Technol Soc 68:101831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101831

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasopoulou E (2017) A half-moon on my skin: a memoir on life with an activity tracker. Eur J Inf Syst 26(3):287–297. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0040-7

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestwich A, Conner M, Hurling R et al. (2016) An experimental test of control theory-based interventions for physical activity. Br J Health Psychol 21(4):812–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12198

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin C, Bock B (2011) Desired features of smartphone applications promoting physical activity. Telemed E-Health 17(10):801–803. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0055

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiyat A, Nourani N, SAMIEI SF (2012) Health improving behaviors in students of Qazvin secondary schools in 2011. JOH 3:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao AK (2019) Wearable sensor technology to measure physical activity (PA) in the elderly. Curr Geriatr Rep 8(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-019-0275-3

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8(4):364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick B, Nigg C (2003) Testing a theoretical model of exercise behavior for older adults. Nurs Res 52(2):80–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200303000-00004

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder A, Eseryel UY, Lehrer C et al. (2021) Why users comply with wearables: the role of contextual self-efficacy in behavioral change. Int J Hum Comput Int 37(3):281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1819669

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos LG, Slavich GM (2023) Wearable technologies for health research: opportunities, limitations, and practical and conceptual considerations. Brain Behav Immun 113:444–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.08.008

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp MA, Michaelis JR, McConnell DS et al. (2018) The role of individual differences on perceptions of wearable fitness device trust, usability, and motivational impact. Appl Ergon 70:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.005

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA, Carroll JM (1999) On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol Bull 125(1):3–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA, Pratt G (1980) A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. J Pers Soc Psychol 38(2):311–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.311

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang G, Wang K, Li S et al. (2023) Effort expectancy mediate the relationship between instructors’ digital competence and their work engagement: evidence from universities in China. Educ Tech Res 71(1):99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10205-4

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultchen D, Reichenberger J, Mittl T et al. (2019) Bidirectional relationship of stress and affect with physical activity and healthy eating. Br J Health Psychol 24(2):315–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12355

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer R, Renner B (2009) Health-specific self-efficacy scales. Freie Universität Berlin. https://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/healself.pdf

  • Seid M, Varni JW, Jacobs JR (2000) Pediatric health-related quality-of-life measurement technology: intersections between science, managed care, and clinical care. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 7:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009541218764

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafique MN, Khurshid MM, Rahman H et al. (2019) The role of wearable technologies in supply chain collaboration: a case of pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Access 7:49014–49026. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2909400

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shandhi MMH, Singh K, Janson N et al. (2024) Assessment of ownership of smart devices and the acceptability of digital health data sharing. Npj Digit Med 7(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01030-x

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiota MN, Papies EK, Preston SD et al. (2021) Positive affect and behavior change. Curr Opin Behav Sci 39(3):222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.022

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MC, Lautert L (2010) The sense of self-efficacy in maintaining health promoting behaviors in older adults. Rev Esc Enferm USP 44:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342010000100009

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivarajah U, Kumar S, Kumar V et al. (2024) A study on big data analytics and innovation: from technological and business cycle perspectives. Technol Forecast Soc 202:123328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123328

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Song CS, Kim YK (2022) The role of the human-robot interaction in consumers’ acceptance of humanoid retail service robots. J Bus Res 146:489–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.087

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroya SH, Farooq A, Mahmood K et al. (2021) From information seeking to information avoidance: understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Inf Process Manag 58(2):102440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spook J, Paulussen T, Kok G (2016) Evaluation of a serious self-regulation game intervention for overweight-related behaviors (“Balance It”): a pilot study. J Med Internet Res 18(9):e225. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4964

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stajkovic AD, Luthans F (1998) Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 124(2):240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Standoli C, Guarneri M, Perego P et al. (2016) A smart wearable sensor system for counter-fighting overweight in teenagers. Sensors 16(8):1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16081220

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stragier J, Abeele MV, Mechant P et al. (2016) Understanding persistence in the use of online fitness communities: comparing novice and experienced users. Comput Hum Behav 64:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.013

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh A, Li M (2022) How the use of mobile fitness technology influences older adults’ physical and psychological well-being. Comput Hum Behav 131(6):107205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107205

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Li YZ, Yuan M (2023) Requirements, challenges, and novel ideas for wearables on power supply and energy harvesting. Nano Energy 115(11):108715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108715

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Topol E (2011) The creative destruction of medicine: how the digital revolution will create better health care. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cappellen P, Rice EL, Catalino LI et al. (2018) Positive affective processes underlie positive health behavior change. Psychol Health 33(1):77–97

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Speier C (1999) Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organ Behav Hum Dec 79(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2837

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield RL (2015) The acceptance and use of innovative technology: do positive and negative feelings matter? ACM SIGMIS Database Database Adv Inf Syst 46(4):48–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843824.2843828

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ (1987) The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res 36(2):76–81

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ (1995) Health promotion model-instruments to measure health promoting lifestyle: health-promoting lifestyle profile [HPLP II] (Adult version). http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/85349

  • Wang J, Hsu Y (2020) The relationship of symmetry, complexity, and shape in mobile interface aesthetics, from an emotional perspective—a case study of the smartwatch. Symmetry 12(9):1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091403

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner B (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev 92(4):548

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SL, French DP (2011) What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour—and are they the same? Health Educ Res 26(2):308–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr005

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer JrRS, Clore GL, Isbell LM (1999) Affect and information processing. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 31:1–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60271-3

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Yu J, Zo H et al. (2016) User acceptance of wearable devices: an extended perspective of perceived value. Telemat Inf 33(2):256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellars KL, Perrewé PL (2001) Affective personality and the content of emotional social support: coping in organizations. J Appl Psychol 86(3):459–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.459

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *