Zhao, G. et al. Mapping the knowledge of green consumption: a meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 44937–44950 (2020).
Google Scholar
Defeng Yang, Yue Lu, Wenting Zhu, & Chenting Su. Going green: how different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior. J. Bus. Res. 68, 2663–2675 (2015).
Google Scholar
McGuire, L. & Beattie, G. Talking green and acting green are two different things: An experimental investigation of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes and low carbon consumer choice. Semiotica2019, 99–125 (2019).
Zubair, M. et al. Message framing and self-conscious emotions help to understand pro-environment consumer purchase intention: an ERP study. Sci. Rep. 10, 18304 (2020).
Google Scholar
Arie, D., Alexander, R. & Suzanne, P. The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory. Psychol. Health 26(8), 1036–1048.(2011).
Google Scholar
Peggy Sue Loroz. The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals. Psychol. Mark. (2007).
Ceren Ekebas Turedi, Elika Kordrostami, Ilgım Dara Benoit. The impact of message framing and perceived consumer effectiveness on green ads. J. Consum. Mark. (2021).
Montgomery, C. & Stone, G. Revisiting Consumer Environmental responsibility: a five nation cross-cultural analysis and comparison of consumer ecological opinions and behaviors. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. (2009).
Tsai, S.-P. Message framing strategy for Brand Communication. J. Advert. Res. 47, 364–377 (2007).
Google Scholar
Olsen, M. C., Slotegraaf, R. J. & Chandukala, S. R. Green Claims and Message frames: how Green New products Change brand attitude. J. Mark. 78, 119–137 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hamutal Kreiner, Eyal Gamliel. The role of attention in Attribute Framing. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. (2018).
Maheswaran, D. & Meyers-Levy, J. The influence of message framing and issue involvement. J. Mark. Res. 27, 361–367 (1990).
Google Scholar
Health Psychol. Off. J. Div. Health Psychol. Am. Psychol. Assoc. (1995).
Katherine White, Rhiannon Macdonnell, Darren W. Dahl. It’s the mind-set that matters: the role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation behaviors. J. Mark. Res. (2011).
Robin L. Nabi, Nathan Walter, Neekaan Oshidary, Camille G. Endacott, Jessica Love-Nichols, Z. J. Lew, Alex Aune. Can emotions capture the elusive gain-loss framing Effect? A Meta-analysis. Commun. Res. (2020).
Helena Bilandzic, Anja Kalch, Jens Soentgen. Effects of goal framing and emotions on perceived threat and willingness to sacrifice for Climate Change. Sci. Commun. (2017).
Shu-Fei Yang. An eye-tracking study of the Elaboration Likelihood Model in online shopping. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. (2015).
Zubair, M., Wang, X., Iqbal, S., Awais, M. & Wang, R. Attentional and emotional brain response to message framing in context of green marketing. Heliyon 6, e04912 (2020).
Google Scholar
Qiang Wei et al. Influence of utilitarian and hedonic attributes on willingness to Pay Green product premiums and neural mechanisms in China: an ERP Study. Sustainability 15, 2403 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ozkara, B. Y. & Bagozzi, R. The use of event related potentials brain methods in the study of conscious and unconscious consumer decision making processes. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 58, 102202 (2021).
Google Scholar
Brakel, L. A. W. & Shevrin, H. Freud’s dual process theory and the place of the a-rational. Behav. Brain Sci. 26, 527–528 (2003).
Google Scholar
Harrington, N. G. & Kerr, A. M. Rethinking risk: Prospect Theory Application in Health Message Framing Research. Health Commun. 32, 131–141 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pincus, J. D. Well-being as need fulfillment: implications for theory, methods, and practice. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. doi: (2023).
Google Scholar
Mcknight, P. & Sechrest, L. The use and misuse of the term ‘experience’ in contemporary psychology: a reanalysis of the experience–performance relationship. Philos. Psychol. 16, 431–460 (2003).
Google Scholar
Michal, S. & Myers, J. G. Donations to Charity as Purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. J. Consum. Res. 24, 434–446 (1998).
Google Scholar
Labarge, M. C. et al. Competitive Paper Session: Hedonic Consumption. Adv. Consum. Res. 31, págs. 316–328 (2004).
Verhagen, T., Boter, J. & Adelaar, T. The effect of product type on consumer preferences for website content elements: an empirical study. J. Comput. Commun. 16, 139–170 (2010).
Noble, S. M., Griffith, D. A. & Weinberger, M. G. Consumer derived utilitarian value and channel utilization in a multi-channel retail context. J. Bus. Res. 58, 1643–1651 (2005).
Google Scholar
Bridges, E. & Florsheim, R. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: the online experience. J. Bus. Res. 61, 309–314 (2008).
Google Scholar
Park, C. & Moon, B. J. The relationship between product involvement and product knowledge: moderating roles of product type and product knowledge type. Psychol. Amp Mark. 20, 977–997 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kapferer, J. N. & Laurent, G. Consumer’S involvement Profile: new empirical results. Adv. Consum. Res. 12, 290–295 (1985).
To, P. L., Liao, C. & Lin, T. H. Shopping motivations on internet: a study based on utilitarian and hedonic value. Technovation 27, 774–787 (2007).
Google Scholar
Morin, C. Neuromarketing: The New Science of Consumer Behavior. Society 48, 131–135 (2011).
Google Scholar
Yoon, E. Y., Humphreys, G. W., Kumar, S. & Rotshtein, P. The neural selection and integration of actions and objects: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 2268–2279 (2012).
Google Scholar
Smidts, A. et al. Advancing consumer neuroscience. Mark. Lett. 25, 257–267 (2014).
Google Scholar
Camerer, C. & Yoon, C. Introduction to the Journal of Marketing Research Special Issue on Neuroscience and Marketing. J. Mark. Res. 52, 423–426 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wei, Q. et al. The influence of Tourist attraction type on product price perception and neural mechanism in Tourism Consumption: an ERP Study. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 16, 3787–3803 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shang, Q., Jin, J., Pei, G., Wang, C. & Qiu, J. Low-order webpage layout in Online Shopping facilitates Purchase decisions: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 13, 29–39 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y.-X. & Luo, Y.-J. Temporal course of emotional negativity bias: An ERP study. Neurosci. Lett. 398, 91–96 (2006).
Google Scholar
Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M. & Hinojosa, J. A. Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 41, 75–85 (2001)
Google Scholar
Wang, C., Fu, W., Jin, J., Shang, Q. & Zhang, X. Differential effects of Monetary and Social rewards on product online rating decisions in E-Commerce in China. Front. Psychol. 11, 1440 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lifshitz, K. THE AVERAGED EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE TO COMPLEX VISUAL STIMULI. Psychophysiology 3, 55–68 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N. & Lang, P. J. Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol. Psychol. 52, 95–111 (2000).
Google Scholar
Psychophysiology 57, (2020).
Shi, J., Guo, J. & Fung, R. Y. K. decision support system for purchasing management of seasonal products: a capital-constrained retailer perspective. Expert Syst. Appl. 80, 171–182 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dini, H., Simonetti, A., Bigne, E. & Bruni, L. E. EEG theta and N400 responses to congruent versus incongruent brand logos. Sci. Rep. 12, 4490 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, Q. et al. The processing of perceptual similarity with different features or spatial relations as revealed by P2/P300 amplitude. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 95, 379–387 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lyons, S. J. & Wien, A. H. Evoking premiumness: how color-product congruency influences premium evaluations. Food Qual. Prefer. 64, 103–110 (2018).
Google Scholar
Palazon, M. & Delgado-Ballester, E. The role of product-Premium Fit in determining the effectiveness of hedonic and utilitarian premiums: PRODUCT-PREMIUM FIT IN HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN PREMIUMS. Psychol. Mark. 30, 985–995 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ding, Z. et al. Factors affecting low-carbon consumption behavior of urban residents: a comprehensive review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 132, 3–15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Saygılı, M. & Yalçıntekin, T. The effect of hedonic value, utilitarian value, and customer satisfaction in predicting repurchase intention and willingness to pay a price premium for smartwatch brands. Management 26, 179–195 (2021).
Google Scholar
Okada, E. M. Justification effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. J. Mark. Res. 42, 43–53 (2005).
Google Scholar
Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R. & Mahajan, V. Form versus function: how the intensities of specific emotions evoked in functional versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product preferences. J. Mark. Res. 44, 702–714 (2007).
Google Scholar
Neurosci. Res. (2017).
Electron. Commer. Res. (2016).
Yen, N.-S., Chen, K.-H. & Liu, E. H. Emotional modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) generalizes to Chinese individuals. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 75, 319–325 (2010).
Google Scholar
van Hooff, J. C., Crawford, H. & van Vugt, M. The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 6, 477–485 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fu, H. et al. Don’t trick me: an event-related potentials investigation of how price deception decreases consumer purchase intention. Neurosci. Lett. 713, 134522 (2019).
Google Scholar
Blood, A. J. & Zatorre, R. J. Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 11818–11823 (2001).
Koechlin, E., Ody, C. & Kouneiher, F. The Architecture of Cognitive Control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302, 1181–1185 (2003).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Huang, H., McGinnis-Deweese, M., Keil, A. & Ding, M. Neural substrate of the late positive potential in emotional Processing. J. Neurosci. 32, 14563–14572 (2012).
Google Scholar
link
